The last time I looked, there were thousands of genealogy websites on the internet, and each one begins with a search for a name. I spent a lot of time on those sites after my divorce–looking for my ancestors, looking for myself
Growing up, I was uncomfortable with my name–Sikorski. It identified me as an outsider, the Polish syllables as foreign to the German-Swiss citizens of my small town as my lanky six-foot frame and dark hair. My name also set me apart as a remnant, an unmatched set with my mother and her new husband. Everyone else’s name matched that of their parents. For years, my sister and I were the only stepchildren in the community. I spent my school years answering to anything that sounded vaguely Polish (“Sishkory? Sirokski? Sisuski? ”) and explaining why my name didn’t match my mother’s (divorce as a concept hadn’t reached our conservative backwater). At 17, I married; a hasty presto-chango into a new life, a new identity. Our matched pair grew to a quartet—balance! symmetry!—and the absolute unremarkability of our life sustained me. For a time.
Eleven exhausting years later, I had outgrown the boy I married and the name he gave me. We divorced, bitterly. To distance myself as much as possible I decided to revert to my maiden name. My sister laughed.
“Why? What does it mean to you?” she asked.
She had a point. Our name and 23 chromosomes were all that our father had given us. In reality, it meant nothing to me. Why keep the name of a man I had never even met? I wanted my new name to be meaningful, and reflect something that was true about me. I decided to create a name from scratch, and in the process, birth a new, improved me along with it, one who would be immune to the mistakes I had made in the past. I would not revert to my old identity: an outcast looking desperately for a matching set to step into. I would find a strong name, one that stood on its own. I spent a lot of time on the renaming project. I searched the family tree, looking for something with an ancestral tie. But one simple fact invaded my consciousness. All surnames of women are rooted in the names of men—given at birth, given at marriage. In some families this is a gift, a source of pride. In my family, as I dug deeper, I found that my female ancestors bore the names of men who abused them, cheated on them, abandoned them, and even murdered them. If there had been time in their daily fight for survival and sanity, did they ever think about their names? Was there ever a woman in our family who had a name she owned, a name that gave her a sense of pride, a feeling of strength?
It would have been nice to go the iconic, one-name route: Cher, Madonna, Liza! “Karen” doesn’t quite have the cachet of those names, and besides, as a nurse, I am expected to be comforting and normative; I am expected to have two names. Otherwise I’m not allowed to handle the narcotics.
My busy life as a single parent curtailed my search for the perfect name. People knew me as Karen C———, and my daughters and I still formed a matched set. Still, every once in a while, I thought about it. I searched webpages about matrilineal societies and their naming customs. My family has always seemed a family of women; my mother, my sister and I formed the core triad, my kind but remote stepfather orbiting somewhere around the edges. My daughters and I re-enacted that family structure. I found little to give me direction, nothing that appealed, nothing that revealed the truth of who I am. One thing was clear, though, and thoroughly matrilineal—the inescapable connection of my female ancestors to the names of men we barely knew or wished we didn’t. Men who, in the end, left us little but a few letters to define our relationship. I gave up. I kept my ex-husband’s name.
Time passed. I met a new man and married him. I hadn’t yet found a name I liked, and his was plain, simple, and easy to spell. It sounded good with my name, an apt trade for an early spot in the alphabet. His name is not his own, either. It is his stepfather’s. His real father refused to give him a name, and left before he saw his son, proving once again that my experiences are not unique.
I hope I will want to share this name forever, but regardless, I think I will be Karen Roberts for the rest of my life. I like its simplicity, its generic feel; the company of 2- million-plus hits on google. This name, with its easy economy and anonymity, reveals nothing true about my nature. Having failed to find one unique name that identifies me, I happened on the next best thing. My name could be everywoman’s name. And so, like a one-size-fits-all gown, it feels just fine.










